Peer Review Process

IJMSM editorial board reviews manuscripts eye for detail on its methodological format that moves a manuscript to its standard to the highest one. Our publishing goal is to publish works that will make a major contribution to the body of knowledge in science, either within or between disciplines. The selected publications should provide unique and broadly significant facts, summaries, or concepts. All scientific disciplines and sources are allowed to submit work.

Submission or Presentation:

Typically, the process starts when a presentation, product, or paper is sent for evaluation. This could be a research paper, a project report, a piece of writing, or even a tangible product. IJMSM’s manuscripts are enter into review process and it is evaluated for further process.

Selection of Reviewers:

IJMSM’s Reviewers may be chosen on the basis of their experience, knowledge, or applicability to the topic, depending on the situation. Peer reviewers in academic settings are frequently selected based on their subject-matter expertise.

Initial Review:

IJMSM’s Reviewers perform a preliminary evaluation to see if the submission satisfies the prerequisites. This could involve following the rules, presenting the information clearly, and overall quality.

Detailed Evaluation:

Reviewers examine the material in-depth to determine its advantages and disadvantages. This entails a thorough analysis of the claims, supporting data, methods, and general organization, if any.

Feedback and Comments:

Reviewers offer helpful criticism by highlighting particular areas that need improvement or praise. For the author or creator to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of their work, this critique is essential.

Revisions:

Authors and other creators are frequently offered the chance to edit their work in response to criticism. The quality of the content is enhanced overall by this iterative approach.

Final Decision:

The ultimate determination has been reached, encompassing the options of approval, disapproval, or acceptance subject to more modifications. Before a decision is made, there may occasionally be several review rounds.

Communication of Results:

The results of the review process are communicated to the authors or makers, along with any further guidelines or remarks. This stage guarantees that the evaluation process is an educational experience and is essential for transparency.

Publication or Implementation:

Depending on the nature of the effort, the content that is accepted may be published. Once the article gets published IJMSM intimate this to the author frequently. The indexing process will go further.